Bring me Your Tired, Your Poor, Your Packer Fans
On Thursday, the Wisconsin State Senate is scheduled to vote on a bill that will allow more competition in the cable television industry. The bill will allow telecommunications providers to compete with cable television system monopolies.
As with anything that appears too good to be true, legislators of both parties are using the occasion of this deregulation bill to - well, impose new regulations. Senate Majority Russ Decker has indicated his intent to amend the bill to require video providers to carry the NFL Network and the Big Ten Network, which carry the occasional Green Bay Packer and Wisconsin Badger football games. Both networks are caught up in power struggles with local cable providers, and as a result, few cable providers carry them on their basic packages. Mandating cable systems carry these networks almost guarantees rate increases to pay for them - which counteracts the very effects of competition the bill is supposed to promote. And since when did it become the job of state legislators to make sure we can all watch the Packers? Is there anything left outside the realm of legislative responsibility? Must the Legislature's first move always be to appeal to the broadest constituency possible, market forces be damned? Furthermore, the Big Ten Network controversy has provoked the University of Wisconsin to start using its official resources to gin up support for the network. On November 2nd, students, alumni, and UW supporters received a "Buckymail" e-mail from the athletic department urging them to contact their cable company in support of carrying the Big Ten Network. So if you're a fan of athletics in Wisconsin, you're getting it coming and going. Everyone seems to have an answer for your viewing needs, except you as a consumer. If seeing the one or two Badger Football games per year on the Big Ten Network was important enough to you, you could get a satellite dish or go to a bar. Yet your government thinks those aren't good enough options --- a testament to the seriousness of a state government carrying a $2.1 billion structural deficit into the next budget.
Referendum Roundup Voters Decide Fate of $302.6 million in Spending Yesterday voters in 8 Wisconsin school districts decided the fate of more than $302.6 million in new school spending. Result: $145 million passed / $157 million failed.
Wisconsin Club for Growth urges taxpayers in these communities to ask their school boards why they chose to hold odd-year single-issue elections at an additional cost to the taxpayers rather than waiting until February or April when voters will be going to the polls to vote in other local and statewide elections. West Bend $119.3 million---to build three new schools and convert/update 7 others. Vote was NO.
Sun Prairie $99.6 million---to build a new High School and convert the High Schoolto a middle school. Vote was YES to $96 million for a new school.Voters said NO to a new pool and exceeding the revenue caps.
Hartford $25.5 million --- to build a new elementary school, update and expand three schools, and permanently exceed state revenue caps by $593,000.to cover operational costs. Vote was NO.
Holmen $17.6 million---- to build a new elementary and permanently exceed the revenue caps by $536,000 to cover operating costs. Vote was YES.
Galesville-Ettrick $14.95 million---to build a new middle school and renovate the high school. Vote was YES.
Abbotsford $12 million---to build a grade school and make other improvements. Vote was YES.
Denmark $9.2 million---to build a gymnasium with two full-size basketball court, increasing space from 9,000 - 25,000 square feet, and increase agricultural science space from 2,700 - 6,000 square feet. Vote was NO.
Prescott $4.48 million---to permanently exceed the revenue caps by $4 ½ million to cover expenses. Vote was YES.
|